Is the architecture strong enough for the transformation you are planning?
An assessment of the quality of your enterprise architecture models, and, where code is in reach, of how far the implemented architecture has drifted from the intended one. Measured with our instruments and read by senior architects, so the readiness question is answered on evidence before budget and people are committed.
The model, the reality, and the gap between them
Model quality, measured
Standardised, objective measurements of your EA repository: structure, consistency, completeness and adherence to good practice, comparable across domains and over time.
Intended versus implemented
Where repository access exists, the dependencies, boundaries and layering in the code are measured and set against the intended architecture, and the gap is tracked as it moves.
Expert assessment
Senior enterprise architects interpret the measurements in the context of your transformation, adding what pure metrics cannot capture.
A readiness verdict
What the architecture can carry today, what has to change first, and the evidence behind both, for the programme decision in front of you.
From repository to readiness
Your repository, as it is
We extract the models from your EA tooling. LeanIX, ArchiMate and Archi are supported today; other repositories are added on request.
Instruments, not questionnaires
The models are measured on a solution-independent quality model, and where code is in reach, the implemented architecture is measured alongside them. Expert configuration is typically needed, and not every technology is supported; we say which.
Senior architects read the result
The measurements are interpreted against your transformation goals, with the people who own the architecture.
Findings and a readiness verdict
A written assessment and a readout with the leadership that has to decide.
Those who have to commit to a transformation
- CIOs and transformation leaders
- The readiness question answered on evidence before the programme starts, and the architecture risks that could derail it.
- Enterprise architects
- Objective measurement of the models they maintain, and the drift between model and code made visible and trackable.
- Programme and portfolio boards
- A basis for sequencing: what the architecture can carry now and what must change first.
Start with the transformation in front of you
Tell us which transformation you are planning and which EA tooling you use. We will propose scope and timeline for the assessment, and whether measuring the implemented architecture is feasible for your technology stack.
What people ask before they start
We use LeanIX. Do you replace it?
No. Your EA tooling stays the system of record. Claroview measures what is in it and how it relates to the code, so the measurement is quality assurance on top of the investment you have already made.
Can the drift measurement run continuously?
Yes, as part of Software Portfolio Assurance: the code side is measured weekly, and the architecture comparison joins the quarterly review once the portfolio is baselined.
Which EA tools and languages are supported?
LeanIX, ArchiMate and Archi for the models. For the implemented architecture, support depends on the technology; we confirm it during scoping.